The Victorian Government has introduced a Bill that would give eligible employees a legal right to work from home up to two days a week, where reasonable — not merely a right to request it.
If passed, this moves working from home from a discretionary arrangement to a formal entitlement. For businesses, it's not just a policy change: it reshapes how requests are handled, how refusals must be justified, and who carries the cost.

With a proposed start date as early as September, many businesses may not have sufficient time to fully assess, plan and prepare for these changes.
Even at this stage, there are unanswered questions about how the legislation would apply in practice.
Now is the time to understand the impact. Download the Member AdviceThe proposed framework introduces concrete obligations and tight timeframes. The detail that matters most:
Per week eligible full-time employees could work from home, where reasonable (pro rata for part-time).
To respond in writing once an employee gives notice of their intention to work from home.
Pays the reasonable costs of enabling remote work — equipment, software and secure system access.
A refusal must be justified against a structured reasonableness test — and clearly documented. "No" becomes a decision you have to evidence.
Maintaining customer service and consistent operational standards as more roles work remotely.
Managing output and day-to-day coordination across a more dispersed workforce.
New notice, assessment and record-keeping obligations, and the compliance risk if requests aren't handled properly.
Straight answers on the practical detail. For advice on your specific situation, our team can help.
Once an eligible employee gives written notice, you'll have 21 days to respond in writing. If you don't intend to agree, your response needs to set out reasons that stand up against the statutory reasonableness test. Getting the process and documentation right from the first request is what reduces your risk.
Refusal is only available where allowing it would not be reasonable — assessed against defined factors such as whether the role's inherent requirements can be met remotely, whether specialised on-site equipment is needed, and the effect on in-person client or stakeholder interactions. It's a structured test, not a general discretion.
This is the practical work to do now: mapping which roles can reasonably be performed from home and which have a defensible on-site requirement, before notices start arriving. A clear, consistent position across similar roles is far easier to justify than case-by-case decisions made under time pressure.
If passed in its current form, the entitlement commences 1 September 2026 for most employers. Small businesses with fewer than 15 employees have a deferred start of 1 July 2027. Either way, the preparation — role assessment, policy updates, response processes — is best done ahead of your commencement date.
Employers would be required to meet the reasonable costs of enabling an eligible employee to work from home, which can include essential hardware and software and secure access to your systems. The scope of "reasonable" is one of the areas where practical guidance matters.
Australian Industry Group is actively engaging with government and stakeholders to ensure business concerns are understood as this Bill progresses.
Australian Industry Group is working with businesses to:
Our Workplace Relations team can help you understand what these changes mean, and how to respond.
We are keen to hear from you about your concerns. Your feedback will inform our ongoing advocacy and ensure real business experiences are represented.